STIPPICH v. MILWAUKEE


34 Wis.2d 260 (1967)

STIPPICH, Appellant, v. CITY OF MILWAUKEE, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

April 11, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there were briefs and oral argument by Maurice Weinstein of Milwaukee.

For the respondent there were briefs by John J. Fleming, city attorney, and George A. Bowman, Jr., assistant city attorney, and oral argument by Mr. Bowman.

A brief anima curiae was filed by Julian Bradbury of Madison, legal counsel for the League of Wisconsin Municipalities.


HALLOWS, J.

The city grounded its defense solely upon the proposition its liability is limited by sec. 81.15, Stats.,1 to an insufficiency or want of repair in the sidewalk existing for a period of three weeks and a mere slippery condition resulting from a natural accumulation of snow and ice in winter, in the absence of an underlying defect which would otherwise be actionable, did not satisfy the statute. Prior to our decision in Holytz...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED


OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases