1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 35 Wis.2d
  5. 35 Wis.2d 140 (1967)
 

ZEPCZYK v. NELSON

35 Wis.2d 140 (1967)

ZEPCZYK and wife, Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. NELSON, Defendant and Respondent: ST. PAUL FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant and Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

May 9, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Pray, Pray & Clark of Ashland, and oral argument by Dale R. Clark.

For the respondents there was a brief and oral argument by John W. Slaby of Phillips.

HANSEN, J.

The order of the trial court denying the motion for summary judgment must be affirmed.

This court has frequently stated that summary judgment should not be granted where there are substantial issues of fact to be determined, when evidence on a material issue is in conflict, or when there are permissible inferences from undisputed facts that would permit a different result. Thompson v. Dairyland Mut. Ins. Co. (1966), 30 Wis...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases