PER CURIAM:
The appellant was convicted upon three counts charging wagering tax violations under 26 U.S.C.A. § 7203. She argues that her convictions should be reversed because of insufficiency of the evidence, illegality of the search of her house, and prejudice of the judge. A consideration of each of these contentions shows them to be entirely without merit.
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
