1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 375 F.2d
  5. 375 F.2d 1011 (1967)
 

PALICIO Y COMPANIA v. BRUSH

No. 415, Docket 30984.

375 F.2d 1011 (1967)

F. PALICIO Y COMPANIA, S. A., Cifuentes Y Compania, Por Larranaga, S. A., Menendez, Garcia Y Compania, Limitada, and Tabacalera Jose L. Piedra, S. A., Plaintiffs-Appellants-Appellees, v. Gilbert P. BRUSH and Monroe Percy Bloch, co-partners, doing business under the firm name and style of Brush & Bloch, Defendants-Appellants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Decided April 26, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leonard B. Boudin, New York City (Rabinowitz & Boudin, New York City, Victor Rabinowitz, New York City, on the brief), for plaintiffs-appellants-appellees.

Jac M. Wolff, New York City (Brush & Bloch, New York City, Monroe Percy Bloch, New York City, on the brief), for defendants-appellants-appellees.

Before MOORE, KAUFMAN and FEINBERG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Having considered the various points raised by plaintiffs-appellants-appellees and defendants-appellants-appellees, we are of the opinion that Judge Bryan's discussion of the facts and his analysis and application of the law are correct; we therefore affirm on the basis of his well reasoned opinion reported at 256 F.Supp. 481 ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases