WETZEL v. WETZEL


35 Wis.2d 103 (1967)

WETZEL, Respondent, v. WETZEL, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

May 9, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there were briefs by Ray T. McCann, attorney, and Leonard L. Loeb of counsel, both of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. McCann.

For the respondent there was a brief by Burke & Schoetz of Milwaukee, and oral argument by John J. Burke.


HALLOWS, J.

On this appeal the defendant does not quarrel with the granting of one third of the property to the plaintiff but contends the manner in which the one third is made available to the plaintiff is an abuse of discretion by the trial court primarily for two reasons: (1) The tax consequences to the defendant arising from the in specie division of assets was not considered by the court, and (2) the plaintiff should have no interest in the stock of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases