1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 250 Cal.App.2d
  5. 250 Cal.App.2d 887 (1967)
 

SCHOMAKER v. OSBORNE

Docket No. 11385.

250 Cal.App.2d 887 (1967)

JOHN H. SCHOMAKER et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. HARRY L. OSBORNE et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

May 11, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hammer & Warren and Thomas J. Hammer, Jr., for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Harold F. Wolters for Defendants and Respondents.

FRIEDMAN, J.

Plaintiffs, husband and wife, seek specific performance of an agreement to purchase real estate, contending that they had exercised their option to buy. The trial court held that they had not effectively exercised their option and that the defendant owners were not bound to convey. Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment denying specific performance.

Plaintiffs bought defendants' bar and restaurant business and leased the real estate on which it was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases