1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 273 F.Supp.
  5. 273 F.Supp. 800 (1967)
 

HEBERT v. MORLEY

No. 65-165.

273 F.Supp. 800 (1967)

Henry HEBERT, Plaintiff, v. Frank MORLEY, William P. Veditz, John R. Eckstein, James Patric Brady, and Harold Kade, Defendants.

United States District Court C. D. California.

July 26, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Alan Montag, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff.

Robert G. Cockins, City Atty., and Robert D. Ogle, Asst. City Atty., City of Santa Monica, Santa Monica, Cal., for defendants Veditz, Morley, Eckstein, and Brady.

Harold W. Kennedy, County Counsel, and Irvin Taplin, Jr., Deputy County Counsel, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant Harold Kade, M.D.

HAUK, District Judge.

The complaint herein adequately states a claim under Section 1 of the Civil Rights Act of 1871, 42 U.S.Code § 1983,1 because it alleges facts which show that the defendants: (1) while acting under color of state statute, ordinance, regulation, custom or usage, (2) subjected, or caused to be subjected, a person within the jurisdiction of the United States to the deprivation of rights, privileges or immunities...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases