1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 26 A.D.2d
  5. 26 A.D.2d 966 (1966)
 

FREDENBURGH v. STATE

26 A.D.2d 966 (1966)

H. Robert Fredenburgh et al., Respondents, v. State of New York, Appellant. (Claim No. 43116.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

November 21, 1966

Per Curiam.

Assuming arguendo that a specialty is here involved and thus that reproduction cost less depreciation is, therefore, a proper method of valuation (see Levine v. State of New York, 24 A.D.2d 524; Guthmuller v. State of New York, 23 A.D.2d 597; Matter of City of New York [Lincoln Sq. Slum Clearance Project], 15 A.D.2d 153

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases