1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 383 U.S.
  5. 383 U.S. 607 (1966)
 

CONSOLO v. FEDERAL MARITIME COMM'N.

No. 63.

383 U.S. 607 (1966)

CONSOLO v. FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION ET AL.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided March 22, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert N. Kharasch argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were William J. Lippman and Amy Scupi.

Richard A. Posner argued the cause for the Federal Maritime Commission and the United States, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Irwin A. Seibel, Milan C. Miskovsky and Walter H. Mayo III.

J. Alton Boyer argued the cause for respondent Flota Mercante Grancolombiana, S. A. With him on the brief was Odell Kominers.

MR. JUSTICE WHITE delivered the opinion of the Court.

We have been asked, in this case, to determine whether the Court of Appeals had jurisdiction to set aside a reparation order of the Federal Maritime Commission which was before it upon the consolidated appeals of the shipper and the carrier, the shipper asking that the award be increased and the carrier asking that it be set aside. In addition, we have been asked to determine...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED
OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases