1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 26 A.D.2d
  5. 26 A.D.2d 71 (1966)
 

GEVINSON v. KIRKEBY-NATUS CORP.

26 A.D.2d 71 (1966)

Daniel Gevinson, Individually and Doing Business as Gevinson Equipment Company, et al., Appellants, v. Kirkeby-Natus Corporation et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

June 14, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles Gottlieb of counsel (J. Anthony Burton with him on the brief; Gottlieb & Schiff, attorneys), for appellants.

Jonathan Shapiro of counsel (Irving J. Alter with him on the brief; Szold, Brandwen, Meyers, Blumberg & Altman, attorneys), for respondents.

McNALLY and STEVENS, JJ., concur with BREITEL, J. P.; EAGER, J., dissents in part in opinion.

BREITEL, J. P.

This appeal raises the question whether plaintiffs should be required to detail in a bill of particulars the statutes and decisional law of a sister State upon which they rely. A lesser question is whether plaintiffs should be required to particularize similarly the methods and computations by which they support their several claims for general damages.

The action is one for conversion of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases