AUTOMATED BUILDING COMPONENTS, INC. v. STRUCTOMATIC, INC.

Nos. 15215, 15216.

362 F.2d 529 (1966)

AUTOMATED BUILDING COMPONENTS, INC., a Florida corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STRUCTOMATIC, INC., an Illinois corporation, Defendant-Appellee, STRUCTOMATIC, INC., an Illinois corporation, Defendant-Cross-Appellant, v. AUTOMATED BUILDING COMPONENTS, INC., a Florida corporation, Plaintiff-Cross-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals Seventh Circuit.

June 27, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert E. LeBlanc, Washington, D. C., Alfred B. Teton, Chicago, Ill., Henry Shur, LeBlanc & Shur, Washington, D. C., Froelich, Grossman, Teton & Tabin, Chicago, Ill., for Automated Building.

Sidney Wallenstein, Charles Spangenberg, Chicago, Ill., for Structomatic.

Before SCHNACKENBERG, CASTLE and SWYGERT, Circuit Judges.


SCHNACKENBERG, Circuit Judge.

Automated Building Components, Inc., a Florida corporation, plaintiff, appeals from an order of the district court holding claims 1, 3 and 4 of United States Letters Patent No. 2,877,520, invalid and dismissing its complaint, and Structomatic, Inc., an Illinois corporation, defendant, cross-appeals from the said order which also dismissed defendant's counterclaim.

Said No. 2,877,520 is known as the Jureit patent. Plaintiff's counsel...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases