SHAPOLSKY v. SHAPOLSKY


53 Misc.2d 830 (1966)

Sam Shapolsky, Plaintiff, v. Harry Shapolsky et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County.

December 20, 1966


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jay Leo Rothschild for defendants. Goldstein & Goldstein for plaintiff.


THOMAS C. CHIMERA, J.

This is a motion by defendants pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd. [a], pars. 5, 7; and subd. [c]) to dismiss each of the 24 causes of action of this third amended complaint on the grounds that each fails to state a cause of action, among other reasons, (1) that the plaintiff has no individual right which he may assert but at most a derivative stockholder's right in behalf of the several corporation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases