1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 365 F.2d
  5. 365 F.2d 478 (1966)
 

SIX TWENTY-NINE PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. ROLLINS TELECASTING, INC.

No. 22624.

365 F.2d 478 (1966)

SIX TWENTY-NINE PRODUCTIONS, INC., Appellant, v. ROLLINS TELECASTING, INC., d/b/a Station WEAR-TV, Channel 3, Pensacola, Florida, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

August 30, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

W. A. Swann, Jr., Pensacola, Fla., for appellant.

Bert Lane, Beggs, Lane, Daniel, Gaines & Davis, Pensacola, Fla., for appellee.

Before WISDOM and COLEMAN, Circuit Judges, and HUGHES, District Judge.

HUGHES, District Judge.

This case presents the question of whether a television station's refusal to accept filmed commercials submitted by an advertising agency on behalf of its clients, payment for which would be made by the station on a commission basis, constitutes a violation of the federal antitrust laws.

Appellant, Six Twenty-Nine Productions, Inc., hereinafter called plaintiff, in a suit against appellee, Rollins Telecasting, Inc., d/b/a WEAR-TV, Pensacola...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases