1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 244 Md.
  5. 244 Md. 590 (1966)
 

HONOLULU LTD. v. CAIN

[No. 245, September Term, 1966.]

244 Md. 590 (1966)

224 A.2d 433

HONOLULU LIMITED v. CAIN, ET VIR

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided December 8, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Phillips L. Goldsborough, III, (on both arguments), with whom were Robert E. Cadigan and Smith, Somerville & Case on the brief, for appellant.

Richard A. Reid (on both arguments), with whom were John E. Ensor and Royston, Mueller, Thomas & McLean on the brief, for appellees.

The cause was argued on 10/11/66 before HAMMOND, C.J., and MARBURY, OPPENHEIMER, BARNES and McWILLIAMS, JJ., and reargued on 11/7/66 before HAMMOND, C.J., and HORNEY, MARBURY, OPPENHEIMER, BARNES, McWILLIAMS and FINAN, JJ.

BARNES, J., delivered the majority opinion of the Court. MARBURY, HORNEY and McWILLIAMS, JJ., dissent. Dissenting opinion by MARBURY, J., at page 600, infra.

On February 27, 1964, 66 year old Margaret Cain, one of the appellees and one of the plaintiffs below, was driven by her daughter-in-law Clara to the Hillendale Shopping Center in Baltimore County. The shopping center is owned by the defendant-appellant Honolulu Limited. The women arrived at Hillendale...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases