1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 31 Wis.2d
  5. 31 Wis.2d 51 (1966)
 

STATE v. VAN BEEK

31 Wis.2d 51 (1966)

STATE, Respondent, v. VAN BEEK, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

May 10, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Cohen, Parins, Cohen & Grant of Green Bay, and oral argument by Steven I. Cohen.

For the respondent the cause was argued by Betty R. Brown, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief were Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general, and William A. Platz, assistant attorney general.

GORDON, J.

Mr. Van Beek urges that the state's evidence was insufficient to prove his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, and he seeks review of his conviction on that basis. The state resists the review in this court for the reason that Mr. Van Beek failed to bring a motion in the trial court either to have a new trial or to set aside the verdict because of the alleged insufficiency of the evidence.

Although the attorney who was appointed by this court to represent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases