1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 256 F.Supp.
  5. 256 F.Supp. 481 (1966)
 

F. PALICIO y COMPANIA, S. A. v. BRUSH

No. 61 Civ. 2299.

256 F.Supp. 481 (1966)

F. PALICIO y COMPANIA, S. A., Cifuentes y Compania, Por Larranaga, S. A., Menendez, Garcia y Compania, Limitada, and Tabacalera Jose L. Piedra, S. A., Plaintiffs, v. Gilbert P. BRUSH and Monroe Percy Bloch, co-partners doing business under the firm name and style of Brush & Bloch, Defendants.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

As Amended September 21, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rabinowitz & Boudin, New York City, for plaintiffs. Victor Rabinowitz, Leonard B. Boudin, Henry Winestine, New York City, of counsel.

Brush & Bloch, New York City, in pro. per. Monroe Percy Bloch, Jac M. Wolff, New York City, of counsel.

OPINION

FREDERICK van PELT BRYAN, District Judge:

The controversy which is the subject of this action arises out of the take-over by the Castro government of Cuba of five leading Cuban manufacturers of cigars whose businesses and principal assets were located in that country. Basically the dispute involves the respective rights of the "interventors" who took possession of the businesses and assets of these manufacturers on behalf of the Cuban government...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases