1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 247 Cal.App.2d
  5. 247 Cal.App.2d 483 (1966)
 

BUTTERFIELD v. TIETZ

Docket No. 8250.

247 Cal.App.2d 483 (1966)

55 Cal. Rptr. 577

WOODROW W. BUTTERFIELD, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. WILBERT OTTO WILLIAM TIETZ et al., Defendants and Respondents; BELHO CORPORATION et al., Third Party Claimants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.

December 23, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dungan, Tobias, Tornay, June & Humphreys, June, Tornay, Humphreys & Reilly, Roy E. June, Wenke, Pilskaln, Kemble & Marz and Harold Pilskaln, Jr., for Third Party Claimants and Appellants.

Ralph G. Pagter for Plaintiff and Respondent.

No appearance for Defendants and Respondents.

FINLEY, J. pro tem.*

Appellant Belho Corporation was not originally a party to this action. It did not become involved as a party until after judgment in the amount of $12,161.55 was entered in favor of plaintiff-respondent Butterfield and against defendants-respondents as judgment debtors. A writ of execution was issued and certain real property originally belonging to defendants-respondents, but then standing in the name of appellant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases