1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 362 F.2d
  5. 362 F.2d 366 (1966)
 

SMITH v. UNITED STATES

No. 20359.

362 F.2d 366 (1966)

Arnold A. SMITH and Rachael Smith, his wife, and Herbert Smith and Evelyn Smith, his wife, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

June 6, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jarril F. Kaplan, Curtis A. Jennings, Moore, Romley, Kaplan, Robbins & Green, Phoenix, Ariz., for appellants.

Richard M. Roberts, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Joseph Kovner, Lawrence B. Silver, Gilbert E. Andrews, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Wm. P. Copple, U. S. Atty., Richard C. Gormley, Asst. U. S. Atty., Phoenix, Ariz., for appellee.

Before POPE, HAMLEY and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Proceeding under the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a) (2), Arnold A. Smith and Herbert Smith, and their wives, brought this action against the United States to recover $7,470 for the taking, use and occupancy of plaintiffs' warehouse and office buildings in Phoenix, Arizona.

We summarize the pertinent allegations of the amended complaint: Until May 8, 1964, and prior thereto, plaintiffs had leased the premises to Lichty Printing and Business...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases