WASHINGTON v. FLENNIKEN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

No. 1750.

188 So.2d 486 (1966)

Willie WASHINGTON, Husband, etc. et ux., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FLENNIKEN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY et al., Defendants-Appellees.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

July 1, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

I. Edwin Henderson, Lake Charles, for plaintiff-appellants.

Cavanaugh, Brame, Holt & Woodley, by John E. Bergstedt, Lake Charles, for defendants-appellees.

Before TATE, HOOD, and CULPEPPER, JJ.


TATE, Judge.

This appeal concerns the sustaining of an exception of vagueness and the subsequent dismissal of the plaintiffs' suit because their amended petition did not sufficiently cure the vagueness complained of. The issues are whether on appeal an appellate court may review an interlocutory judgment of a trial court sustaining an exception of vagueness and, if so, whether the trial court's rulings on the matter are correct in the present case.

The plaintiffs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases