1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 47 N.J.
  5. 47 N.J. 10 (1966)
 

HARDY v. RUHNKE

47 N.J. 10 (1966)

218 A.2d 861

RUTH HARDY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, AND PETER LOOS, CLARK F. MORRIS, JR., EDWARD T. LYONS, ALBERT J. FRASCA AND JOSEPH P. O'HERN, PLAINTIFFS, v. EDWARD E. RUHNKE, SR., INDIVIDUALLY AND AS CITY CLERK OF EAST ORANGE, AND THE CITY OF EAST ORANGE, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided April 4, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Chester K. Ligham argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant.

Mr. William L. Brach argued the cause for defendants-respondents.

The opinion of the court was delivered by HALL, J.

The assertion in this appeal is that the statute under which the City of East Orange has been governed since January 1, 1964, Chapter 149 of the Laws of 1963, N.J.S.A. Acts Saved from Repeal 40:103-5(71) through (127), or at least certain provisions thereof, is a private, special or local law regulating the internal affairs of the city prohibited by N.J. Const. 1947, Art. IV, §...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases