1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 385 U.S.
  5. 385 U.S. 138 (1966)
 

UNITED STATES v. ACME PROCESS CO.

No. 86.

385 U.S. 138 (1966)

UNITED STATES v. ACME PROCESS EQUIPMENT CO.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided December 5, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Solicitor General Marshall argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Assistant Attorney General Douglas, Richard A. Posner, David L. Rose and Robert V. Zener.

Jack Rephan argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Raymond R. Dickey and Bernard Gordon.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court.

The respondent, Acme Process Equipment Company, brought this action against the United States in the Court of Claims to recover damages for breach of a contract under which Acme undertook through itself and subcontractors to manufacture 2,751 75-mm. recoilless rifles for about $337 per rifle. Among other defenses, the United States alleged that it had rightfully canceled its contract with Acme because three of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases