1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 254 F.Supp.
  5. 254 F.Supp. 242 (1966)
 

FMC CORPORATION v. DAYBROOK-OTTAWA CORPORATION

No. C65-226.

254 F.Supp. 242 (1966)

FMC CORPORATION et al., Plaintiffs, v. DAYBROOK-OTTAWA CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court N. D. Ohio, W. D.

May 23, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald R. Fraser, Toledo, Ohio, Harold C. Hohbach, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs.

Albert L. Ely, Jr., Cleveland, Ohio, for defendant.

DON J. YOUNG, District Judge.

In this patent infringement suit defendant objects to eighteen interrogatories propounded by plaintiffs.

The controversy between the parties revolves primarily about interrogatory 1 which reads as follows:

"1. Has defendant, or its predecessors in interest in the period from October 28, 1959 to September 28, 1965, either made, used or sold within the United States any apparatus of the general character including a mobile...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases