1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 32 Wis.2d
  5. 32 Wis.2d 398 (1966)
 

TOBAR v. STATE

32 Wis.2d 398 (1966)

TOBAR, Plaintiff in error, v. STATE, Defendant in error.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

November 1, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff in error there was a brief and oral argument by Milton M. Cohn of Milwaukee.

For the defendant in error the cause was argued by Robert E. Sutton, assistant district attorney of Milwaukee county, with whom on the brief were Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general, and Hugh R. O'Connell, district attorney.

HANLEY, J.

Two issues are raised on this review:

(1) Was the evidence presented at the trial sufficient to prove defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt?

(2) Was evidence seized in the search made twentytwo hours subsequent to the specific offense charged relevant to the issues and admissible in rebuttal?

Sufficiency of Evidence.

The test employed in assessing the sufficiency...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases