CLAY, Commissioner.
On this appeal from an order denying appellant relief on his motion under RCr 11.42, it is contended that appellant was entitled to an evidentiary hearing and that he was denied due process of law because he did not have counsel at a preliminary hearing in the Paducah police court.
Obviously an evidentiary hearing (with the appellant present) would serve no purpose when no material issue of fact was raised by appellant's motion. See Oakes...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
