1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 47 N.J.
  5. 47 N.J. 345 (1966)
 

CRAMER v. BETCHNER

47 N.J. 345 (1966)

221 A.2d 9

BETTY CRAMER AND ALBERT CRAMER, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. NEIL J. BETCHNER, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided June 10, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Nathaniel Rogovoy argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Rogovoy, Porreca & Okoniewski, attorneys; Mr. Nathaniel Rogovoy on the brief).

Mr. Philip A. Gruccio argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Tuso, Gruccio and Tuso, attorneys; Mr. George A. Ciervo on the brief).

The opinion of the court was delivered PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff Betty Cramer instituted a suit for personal injuries sustained when an automobile driven by the defendant struck the rear of an automobile owned and operated by her husband, plaintiff Albert Cramer. At the time of the accident Mrs. Cramer was a passenger in her husband's automobile. Albert Cramer seeks damages per quod.

In his answer defendant denied...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases