1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 364 F.2d
  5. 364 F.2d 18 (1966)
 

ROSEMAN v. UNITED STATES

No. 19636.

364 F.2d 18 (1966)

Bernard ROSEMAN and Bernard Copley, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

As Modified on Denial of Rehearing August 24, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William C. Wunsch, of Faulkner, Sheehan & Wiseman, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant Roseman.

Luke McKissack, Los Angeles, Cal., Jerome Berg, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant Copley.

Cecil F. Poole, U. S. Atty., Jerrold M. Ladar, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., Arthur A. Dickerman, Atty., Dept. of Health, Education and Welfare, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before HAMLIN, MERRILL and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges.

HAMLIN, Circuit Judge.

Bernard Roseman and Bernard Copley, hereinafter appellants, were charged in a nine-count indictment in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Southern Division, with violating 18 U.S.C. § 545, the conspiracy statute, and various sections of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, arising out of certain activities of the appellants concerning the drug LSD.

Counts 1 and 2 charge appellants with...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases