1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 362 F.2d
  5. 362 F.2d 5 (1966)
 

TURBO MACHINE COMPANY v. PROCTOR & SCHWARTZ, INC.

No. 15422.

362 F.2d 5 (1966)

TURBO MACHINE COMPANY and Alba-Waldensian, Inc. v. PROCTOR & SCHWARTZ, INC. and Proctor Hydro-Set Company, Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Decided May 11, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leon Edelson, Charles H. Howson, Jr., Philadelphia, Pa., for appellants.

Robert B. Frailey, Philadelphia, Pa. (Henry N. Paul, Jr., Stuart S. Bowie, Philadelphia, Pa., Paul & Paul, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellees.

Before McLAUGHLIN, HASTIE and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

HASTIE, Circuit Judge.

As plaintiff in the court below, appellee, Turbo Machine Co., sought a declaratory adjudication that the claims of Bailey Patent No. 3,022,926, now owned by the defendant Proctor & Schwartz, Inc.,1 are neither valid nor infringed by an apparatus manufactured by the plaintiff and marketed under the name "Turbo Dye Boarder". At the trial the defendant conceded that no Bailey...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases