1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 259 F.Supp.
  5. 259 F.Supp. 99 (1966)
 

SECURITIES & EXCH. COM'N v. GREAT AMERICAN INDUSTRIES, INC.

No. 60 Civ. 1734.

259 F.Supp. 99 (1966)

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. GREAT AMERICAN INDUSTRIES, INC., Walter S. Mack, Jerome Matusow, Frederick J. Pagnani, William Thomas Beard, Emanuel Lester, Odie R. Seagraves, Bernard D. Marren, Irving Stolz, Adam Mele, Defendants.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

October 4, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Walter P. North, Washington, D. C., David P. Bicks, New York City, N. Y., Leonard H. Rossen, Washington, D. C., Frederic C. Jacobs, Philadelphia, Pa., Meyer Eisenberg, Joel J. Rabin, David J. Myerson, Washington, D. C., and Stanley Sporkin, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, New York City, for defendants, Great American Industries, Inc., Walter S. Mack, Bernard D. Marren and Irving Stolz, Simon H. Rifkind, Richard Paul, and Thomas R. Farrell, Jr., New York City, Purcell & Nelson, Ganson Purcell, Washington, D. C., of counsel.

Rogge, Wright, Rogge & Wiener, New York City, for defendant, Jerome Matusow, O. John Rogge, New York City, of counsel.

Walter Feldesman, New York City, for defendant, Frederick J. Pagnani, Justin W. D'Atri, New York City, of counsel.

Leinwand, Maron & Hendler, New York City, for defendant, William T. Beard, Isidor E. Leinwand, New York City, of counsel.

Irving Fliegler, New York City, for defendants, Emanuel Lester and Odie R. Seagraves.

Rogers, Hoge & Hills, New York City, for defendant, Adam Mele, Alfred P. O'Hara, New York City, of counsel.

OPINION

RYAN, Chief Judge.

In this action the Commission seeks to enjoin all but defendant Mele from further alleged violations of Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5; three defendants, Mack, Marren and Stolz, from further alleged violations of Section 13(a) and Rule 13a-11; and two defendants, Stolz and Mele, from further alleged violations of Section 16(a) and Rule 16a-1 of the SEA of 1934. The Commission also seeks a mandatory injunction directing Mack, Marren...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases