1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 100 Ariz.
  5. 100 Ariz. 167 (1966)
 

CARUSO v. SUPERIOR COURT IN AND FOR COUNTY OF PIMA

No. 8699-PR.

100 Ariz. 167 (1966)

412 P.2d 463

Frank C. CARUSO, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT of the State of Arizona, IN AND FOR the COUNTY OF PIMA, Father Ryle and the Catholic Social Service, Tucson, Arizona, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Arizona, En Banc.

March 23, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Healy, Laubscher & Dickerson, by F. Dale Healy, Tucson, for petitioner.

Darrell F. Smith, Atty. Gen., by Philip M. Haggerty, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondents State of Arizona and County of Pima.

Murphy & Vinson, by John U. Vinson, Tucson, for respondent The Catholic Social Service.

BERNSTEIN, Vice Chief Justice.

Pursuant to 17 A.R.S. Rule 47(b), Rules of the Supreme Court and A.R.S. § 12-120.24, we granted a petition to review the decision of the Court of Appeals reported in 2 Ariz.App. 134, 406 P.2d 852, which quashed an alternative writ and denied a permanent writ of prohibition.

Petitioner sought a writ of prohibition to restrain the Juvenile Court of...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED
OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases