1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 47 N.J.
  5. 47 N.J. 161 (1966)
 

MAZZA v. BD. OF ADJUSTMENT OF CITY OF BRIDGETON

47 N.J. 161 (1966)

219 A.2d 615

ANTHONY J. MAZZA AND MARY ANN MAZZA ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF BRIDGETON ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided May 9, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. William Gallner argued the cause for appellants (Mr. Steven Z. Kleiner, on the brief; Messrs. Gallner & Kleiner, attorneys).

Mr. David L. Horuvitz argued the cause for respondent, Mary Schrank.

Mr. Arnold L. Bauer argued the cause for respondents the Mayor and City Council of the City of Bridgeton and the Planning Board of the City of Bridgeton.

Mr. Basil D. Beck, Jr., argued the cause for respondent the Board of Adjustment of the City of Bridgeton.

The opinion of the court was delivered PER CURIAM.

In this matter which was certified for disposition by us, the municipality granted a zoning variance to authorize construction of a garden apartment on land zoned against such structures. During pendency of the appeal the city amended the zoning ordinance in such fashion that garden apartments became a permitted use in the zone where the property in question is located. Under the circumstances, on the record before...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases