JESWALD v. HUTT

No. 175258.

17 Ohio Misc. 3 (1966)

JESWALD v. HUTT ET AL.

Common Pleas Court of Mahoning County.

Decided April 11, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Bernard J. Wilkes and Mr. Daniel L. Rossi, for plaintiff.

Messrs. Manchester, Bennett, Powers & Ullman and Mr. John H. Ranz, for defendants.


RIGELHAUPT, J.

This day this cause came on for hearing on the motion of the defendants filed herein, for judgment nothwithstanding the verdict.

On consideration of the evidence, it is the opinion of this court that the motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict is well taken.

The claim of the plaintiff was: (1) That there were no lights in the parking lot maintained by the defendants; (2) that there was an accumulation of ice and snow on said...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases