HICKS v. DAYMUDE

No. H-254.

190 So.2d 6 (1966)

Zada J. HICKS and Jack R. Hicks, Her Husband, Appellants, v. Arthur L. DAYMUDE, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

September 13, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James C. Bray, of Mahon & Mahon, Jacksonville, for appellants.

Boyd, Jenerette & Leemis, Jacksonville, for appellee.


SACK, Judge.

Appellant was the plaintiff in the court below, in an automobile accident case. The jury returned a verdict for the appellee-defendant.

As a result of the accident, the plaintiff claimed, among other elements, an injury to her back. Upon cross-examination she admitted to two prior automobile accidents, but denied an injury to her back in an alleged fall in a Sears-Roebuck store. She was then asked about...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases