LUNDQUIST v. WESTERN CASUALTY & SURETY CO.


30 Wis.2d 159 (1966)

LUNDQUIST, Respondent, v. WESTERN CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY and another, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

March 1, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there were briefs by Chambers, Nash, Pierce & Podvin of Wisconsin Rapids, and oral argument by Lloyd L. Chambers and Lawrence R. Nash.

For the respondent there was a brief and oral argument by Herman J. Glinski of Stevens Point.


CURRIE, C. J.

These two issues are presented by the instant appeal:

(1) Was plaintiff's causal negligence equal to at least 50 percent of the total, aggregate causal negligence of himself and defendant?

(2) Did the trial court commit error which affected the amount of damages awarded plaintiff?

Comparison of Negligence.

In the area of the accident the paved portion of Highway 13 is 22 feet wide with an 11-foot shoulder on the...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED


OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases