1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 33 Wis.2d
  5. 33 Wis.2d 137 (1966)
 

BUHLER v. RACINE COUNTY

33 Wis.2d 137 (1966)

BUHLER and others, Respondents, v. RACINE COUNTY and another, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

December 2, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief and oral argument by Edward A. Krenzke, corporation counsel.

For the respondents there was a brief by La France, Thompson, Greenquist, Evans & Dye and William E. Dye and Adrian P. Schoone, all of Racine, and oral argument by Mr. William E. Dye and Mr. Schoone.

A brief amicus curiae was filed by Brach & Wheeler of Racine.

HALLOWS, J.

The trial court held the Racine county zoning ordinance was valid and only in the retention of the Buhler land in the residential district by denying the past application of the plaintiffs for an amendment of the zoning ordinance did Racine county act arbitrarily, unreasonably and abuse its discretion. The trial court in its conclusions of law held the Buhler land had been for many years located in the center of a commercial

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases