1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 30 Wis.2d
  5. 30 Wis.2d 134 (1966)
 

McPHILLIPS v. BLOMGREN

30 Wis.2d 134 (1966)

McPHILLIPS, Appellant, v. BLOMGREN and another, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

March 1, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Robert R. Gavin of Spring Valley, and John Oltman of Ellsworth, and oral argument: by Mr. Gavic.

For the respondents there was a brief by Gwin & Fetzner: of Hudson, and oral argument by John W. Fetzner.

BEILFUSS, J.

The plaintiff-appellant concedes that a trial court's order for a new trial in the interests of justice will not be reversed unless there is a clear showing of abuse of discretion.

He does contend, however, that if the evidence was sufficient to support the jury's findings the verdict should not be set aside nor a new trial granted.1

This court has not so restricted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases