1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 47 N.J.
  5. 47 N.J. 102 (1966)
 

McCLINTOCK v. CITY OF TRENTON

47 N.J. 102 (1966)

219 A.2d 510

FRANK W. McCLINTOCK, T/A AUTHORIZED VACUUM SERVICE, ARTHUR GROSS, GEORGE OWENS, T/A AMERICAN RADIO CO., ARNOLD CONSTABLE, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, AND BERNARD SCHULMAN, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. CITY OF TRENTON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, JOHN GRAHAM, AND PARKING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF TRENTON, A PUBLIC BODY CORPORATE AND POLITIC OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND THE GREATER TRENTON COUNCIL, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION NOT FOR PECUNIARY PROFIT, INTERVENING DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided May 2, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Richard M. Glazer argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Kahn, Schildkraut & Levy, attorneys; Mr. Nathan N. Schildkraut and Mr. Richard M. Glazer, on the brief).

Mr. Ronald Berman argued the cause for respondent City of Trenton (Mr. Robert R. Ross, City Counsel, City of Trenton, attorney; Mr. Ronald Berman, on the brief).

Mr. A. Arthur Davis, 3rd, argued the cause for respondent John Graham (Messrs. Wharton, Stewart & Davis, attorneys).

Mr. John J. Connell argued the cause for respondent Parking Authority of the City of Trenton.

Mr. Crawford Jamieson argued the cause for respondent The Greater Trenton Council (Messrs. Jamieson, Walsh, McCardell & Moore, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiffs filed a complaint in the Law Division attacking a contract entered into between the City of Trenton acting as the local public agency and John Graham for the sale of land for private redevelopment. They named the City of Trenton, John Graham and the Parking Authority of the City of Trenton as defendants and The Greater Trenton Council was later permitted to intervene as a party defendant. Motions for summary judgment were made by the city...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases