ROSENAU v. CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK


93 N.J. Super. 49 (1966)

224 A.2d 689

JAMES N. ROSENAU AND NORAH ROSENAU, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK, NEW JERSEY, AND WORTHINGTON GAMON METER COMPANY OF NEWARK, NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 6, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Edward K. Zuckerman argued the cause for appellants.

Mr. Frank N. Yurasko argued the cause for respondent Worthington Gamon Meter Company of Newark, New Jersey (Messrs. Champi, Graham and Franchino, attorneys; Mr. Robert M. Graham, on the brief).

Before Judges GAULKIN, LEWIS and LABRECQUE.


The opinion of the court was delivered by LABRECQUE, J.A.D.

Plaintiffs sued for property damage allegedly brought about by the bursting of a water meter in their home. Defendants are the City of New Brunswick, which operates a water system in that municipality, and Worthington Gamon Meter Company (Gamon), which manufactured the water meter which allegedly burst.

The meter in question was one of 60 purchased by...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases