1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 357 F.2d
  5. 357 F.2d 1018 (1966)
 

SCHWARZENBEK v. EVERING

Patent Appeal No. 7490.

357 F.2d 1018 (1966)

Eugene F. SCHWARZENBEK and John Turkevich, Appellants, v. Bernard L. EVERING, John R. Coley and William A. Wilson, Appellees.

United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

Rehearing Denied June 9, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John C. Quinlan, New York City, Arnold G. Gulko, Washington, D. C. (James W. Clement, Chicago, Ill., Marylin Klosty, New York City, Max Dressler, Chicago, Ill., of counsel), for appellants.

Arthur G. Gilkes, Edward B. Beale, Washington, D. C. (Malvin R. Mandelbaum, James H. Callahan, New York City, Douglas G. Brace, New York City, of counsel), for appellees.

Before RICH, Acting Chief Judge, MARTIN, SMITH, and ALMOND, Judges, and WILLIAM H. KIRKPATRICK.

RICH, Acting Chief Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Board of Patent Interferences awarding priority of invention in interference No. 89,674 to Evering, Coley and Wilson, hereinafter Evering et al.

The interference involves an application of Evering et al., entitled "Oxidative Reactivation of Platinum Hydroforming Catalysts," serial No. 601,073, filed July 30, 1956, as a continuation-in-part of application serial No. 292,294, filed June 7, 1952...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases