WINFORD v. STATE

41669.

112 Ga. App. 893 (1966)

147 S.E.2d 52

WINFORD v. THE STATE.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Decided January 18, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

B. Clarence Mayfield, for appellant.

Andrew J. Ryan, Jr., Solicitor, Tom A. Edenfield, for appellee.


HALL, Judge.

The defendant contends that the State's evidence was insufficient to prove her guilty of the crime of which she was accused. The accusation alleged that the defendant "did unlawfully keep, maintain, employ and carry on a certain scheme and device for the hazarding of money . . . known as and called `Bolita.'" By Code § 26-6502 this is made a crime.

There was testimony of the following facts: Officers had had the defendant's house under...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases