RICE v. GRUETZMACHER


27 Wis.2d 46 (1965)

RICE, Plaintiff, v. GRUETZMACHER and others, Defendants and Respondents: MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant and Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

March 5, 1965.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Moore & Moore of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Raymond J. Moore.

For the respondents there was a brief by Arnold, Murray & O'Neill of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Suel O. Arnold.


GORDON, J.

The problem before us is whether a forklift is a motor vehicle under the quoted direct-action statutes. If it is, its insurer can be named as a party defendant in this lawsuit. The trial court concluded that there were questions of fact surrounding such determination and, therefore, denied the insurer's request for summary judgment. The Wisconsin statutes contain various definitions of "motor vehicle" and "vehicle:"

"340.01 (35) `Motor vehicle'...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED


OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases