1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 26 Wis.2d
  5. 26 Wis.2d 569 (1965)
 

SCHOENFELDT v. BABCOCK

26 Wis.2d 569 (1965)

SCHOENFELDT, Individually and as Administrator, Appellant, v. BABCOCK and wife, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

March 2, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Charles W. Sturm, Charles E. Nicoud, and Charles Saggio, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Saggio.

For the respondents there was a brief by Grootemaat, Cook & Franke, attorneys, and Robert E. Cook and Francis R. Croak of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Robert E. Cook.

GORDON, J.

The trial court granted a nonsuit at the close of the plaintiff's case, and we must determine whether such ruling was proper. Upon a motion for nonsuit, the evidence is to be viewed in a light most favorable to the plaintiff, and the plaintiff must also be given the benefit of the mostfavorable inferences which can be deduced from the evidence. Bartz v. Braun (1961), 14 Wis.2d 425, 427, 111 N.W.2d 431; Lake...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases