1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 27 Wis.2d
  5. 27 Wis.2d 496 (1965)
 

MEDVED v. MEDVED

27 Wis.2d 496 (1965)

MEDVED, Respondent, v. MEDVED, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

June 1, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief and oral argument by Paul Medved of Muskego, pro se.

For the respondent there was a brief by Hippenmeyer & Reilly and oral argument by Dale W. Arenz, all of Waukesha.

CURRIE, C. J.

Defendant's brief and oral argument raised no question with respect to the merits of the judgment, but were directed to the issue that he should be awarded a new trial. He contends he is entitled to a new trial because of the incompetence of the three lawyers he had represent him in different stages of the litigation, and the action of the circuit court in insisting on the trial taking place at a time when defendant was unprepared.

Sec. 270.49...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases