MEDNIS v. INDUSTRIAL COMM.


27 Wis.2d 439 (1965)

MEDNIS, Appellant, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION and others, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

April 27, 1965.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there were briefs and oral argument by Bernard C. Westfahl of Milwaukee.

For the respondent Industrial Commission the cause was argued by James P. Altman, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief were Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general, and Gordon Samuelsen, assistant attorney general.

For the respondents North Side Lumber & Fuel Company and Globe Indemnity Company there was a brief by Gibbs, Roper & Fifield, and oral argument by Robert J. Loots, all of Milwaukee.


BEILFUSS, J.

The applicant appellant asserts that prior to the industrial injury of December 11, 1961, he had industrial usable vision in his left eye which was completely lost as a result of the injury, and that under the Workmen's Compensation Act he is entitled to full benefits.

Sec. 102.52, Stats., provides in part:

"PERMANENT PARTIAL DISABILITY SCHEDULE. In cases included in the following schedule of permanent partial disabilities indemnity shall...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases