McMURRAY v. BATEMAN

23023.

221 Ga. 240 (1965)

144 S.E.2d 345

McMURRAY v. BATEMAN.

Supreme Court of Georgia.

Decided September 9, 1965.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Archer, Patrick & Sidener, James H. Archer, Jr., Don H. Sidener, Arnold & Harris, Ross Arnold, Nancy Pat Phillips, Robert B. Harris, for plaintiff in error.

Grant, Spears & Duckworth, William H. Duckworth, Jr., contra.


QUILLIAN, Justice.

1. The defendant, plaintiff in error here, contends his general demurrer should have been sustained because the contract between the parties, made a part of the petition and upon which the plaintiff's cause is based, is unilateral and unenforceable. A contract is unilateral in the sense that renders it invalid "when one party to it is bound and the other is not, or when one party gets something and the other

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases