1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 242 Or.
  5. 242 Or. 63 (1965)
 

OREGON INVESTMENT CO. v. SCHRUNK

242 Or. 63 (1965)

408 P.2d 89

OREGON INVESTMENT CO. ET AL v. SCHRUNK ET AL

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed November 24, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George W. Mead, Portland, argued the cause and filed briefs for appellants.

Richard A. Braman, Deputy City Attorney, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Alexander G. Brown, City Attorney, and Emory J. Crofoot, Deputy City Attorney.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and PERRY, O'CONNELL, DENECKE and LUSK, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

LUSK, J.

This is a declaratory judgment proceeding in which the court allowed a motion of the defendants for a decree on the pleadings. Plaintiffs appeal.

Plaintiffs are, some of them, the owners, and others the lessees, of a half block in the downtown "core area" of the City of Portland. The property is used as an automobile parking lot. Defendants are the mayor, city commissioners (comprising the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases