1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 27 Wis.2d
  5. 27 Wis.2d 219 (1965)
 

TYRRELL v. INDUSTRIAL COMM.

27 Wis.2d 219 (1965)

TYRRELL, Appellant, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION and others, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

March 30, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there were briefs by Bonk, Lutz & Hertel of Chilton, and oral argument by Robert W. Lutz.

For the respondent Industrial Commission there was a brief by Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general, and Beatrice Lampert, assistant attorney general.

For the respondents De Laval Separator Company and American Surety Company there was a brief by Kluwin, Dunphy, Hankin & Hayes of Milwaukee, and oral argument by John A. Kluwin.

BEILFUSS, J.

Is there any credible evidence or reasonable inference drawn therefrom to support the finding of the Industrial Commission that at the time of the accident the employee, Tyrrell, "had deviated for a personal purpose and had not returned to the normal route to be used in his work." Under the familiar rule, if there is such evidence in the record the finding of the commission must be affirmed.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases