ROGERS v. ROGERS

No. 115.

144 S.E.2d 48 (1965)

265 N.C. 386

William Scott ROGERS v. Walter Scott ROGERS, B. K. Meadows, and Jones Davis.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 29, 1965.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Uzzell & DuMont, Asheville, for plaintiff appellee.

Williams, Williams & Morris, Asheville, for defendant appellant.


PER CURIAM.

The appellant assigns as error the failure of the court below to sustain his motion for judgment as of nonsuit, interposed at the close of plaintiff's evidence and renewed at the close of all the evidence.

A careful consideration of the evidence adduced in the trial below leads us to the conclusion that it was sufficient to carry the case to the jury against the defendant Davis, and we so hold.

The appellant also assigns as error numerous...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases