Per Curiam.
In this action, petitioner contends that he was forced to plead guilty without being represented by counsel. Petitioner argues first that he did not have counsel during the period from December until May when he entered his plea of guilty. In rebuttal to this the respondent introduced into evidence a series of letters from the prosecuting attorney's office to a local attorney informing the attorney of hearing dates on petitioner's case. These letters...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
