HENNINGTON v. VALUCH


27 Wis.2d 130 (1965)

HENNINGTON, Respondent, v. VALUCH, d/b/a PAUL VALUCH PLUMBING & HARDWARE, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

March 30, 1965.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief and oral argument by Stephen J. Hajduch of Milwaukee.

For the respondent there was a brief by Peregrine, Schimenz & Marcuvitz of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mathias G. Schimenz.


WILKIE, J.

The sole issue presented on this appeal is whether the trial court erred in entering judgment notwithstanding the verdict for respondent. A judgment notwithstanding the verdict admits the findings of the verdict to be true, but grants judgment on grounds other than decided by the jury.1 It is undisputed that the lateral from the Hennington building was not connected to the city's sewer as specifically called for by the contract...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases