1. (a) The trial judge failed to specify the grounds of the second motion for a new trial as amended on which he based his grant of the motion. Prior to 1959, this court held that there was no provision of law under which the trial judge could be compelled to so specify. Bass v. Pharr,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.